Elisa Miriam Kössi

PhD candidate - 2nd cohort
Church History

Elisa Miriam Kössi was born 1995 in Lahti, Finland. She has studied theology at Abo Akademi (Turku, Finland) and Göttingen (Germany), as well as Classical Syriac at Oxford (UK). On the side of her theological ambitions, she has graduated with a Bachelor‘s degree in Social Services (TUAS, Finland). Her research interests include ecumenism and the narrative aspects of a Christian worldview, especially in conjunction to sacred scripture. Fascinated by Stanley Hauerwas‘s narrative approach to Christian ethics, she was led to explore the concept of the so-called ‚rewritten Bible‘ in her Master‘s thesis. She is excited to combine her theological interests with her passion for languages in her current study on the autonomy of a heteronomous text.

Elisa Miriam Kössi

Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena
GRK 2792 (Theologische Fakultät)
Fürstengraben 6
07743 Jena

Research project

The purpose of my project is to provide insight in Ishodad of Merv’s theological thought by examining his exegesis on the Pentateuch. Ishodad composed his work in around the mid-8th century C.E., and his commentaries are the largest surviving theological text corpus from the early East-Syriac tradition. Despite this fact, publications on Ishodad within the Western academia have remained sporadic to date. My aim with this project is to contribute to filling out this gap with the resulting monography.

Ishodad of Merv’s commentaries provide an especially apt topic within the framework of heteronomous texts research. Ishodad writes namely in the form of both commentaria following the Biblical text and commenting on passages that according to him need further attention, and collectiones where he quotes other authors and Biblical translations to shed light on the passages in question. Further layers of heteronomy are introduced when Ishodad’s access to his sources often seems to depend upon circulating quote collections or paraphrases of his time. In addition, Ishodad’s texts themselves function as pretext for later compositions, thus participating in heteronomy beyond their own immediate scope.

This described heteronomy plays a key part for the questions I ask to my source text. How do these different modi of heteronomy inform Ishodad‘s overall composition? How does Ishodad make use of this heteronomy to prove his own point? What are Ishodad‘s main theological concerns when expounding the first five books of his Bible?

Curriculum Vitae

Since 2025 | Doctoral Researcher (Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Graduate College “Autonomy of Heteronomous Texts in Antiquity and the Middle Ages”)

2020-2024 | Bachelor in Social Services (TUAS, Finland)

2021-2022 | MSt in Syriac Studies (Oxford, UK)

2019-2022 | MA in Theology (Abo Akademi, Finland)

2018-2020 | Erasmus+ Student Mobility (Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Germany)

2015-2019 | BA in Theology (Abo Akademi, Finland)